There are well-informed, rational non-believers in the world and God would not allow that.Consciousness is explainable solely on the basis of material processes.If something has no structure, then “it is as much nothing as nothing can be”.Nothing* isn’t really nothing, it is “the total chaos that we project existed just before the big bang”.Regarding the beginning of the universe, the explanation is that something came from nothing*.The laws of physics are not objectively real, they are “our inventions”.It’s theoretically possible that quantum tunneling explains the origin of the universe.The beginning of the universe is not ordered (low entropy) but random and chaotic.Human life is not optimally designed and appears to be the result of a blind, ad hoc evolutionary process.God doesn’t exist because people who believe in him are ignorant.There is no scientific evidence that God answers prayers.The Bible says that the Earth is flat, etc.God doesn’t talk to people and tell them things they couldn’t possibly know.There is no scientific evidence for God acting in the universe.

There is no scientific evidence for God’s existence in the textbooks.The resurrection of Jesus (3-fact version).The debate includes 30 minutes of Q&A with the students. I still think that it is very entertaining even without the snarky paraphrasing. There is almost no snark in this summary. He also caused the audience to start laughing when he said that Jesus was not moral and supported slavery. He also denies the law of conservation of energy and asserts that something can come from nothing in his concluding speech (1:33:50). In this debate, Victor Stenger does affirm his belief that the universe could be eternal in his second rebuttal (1:02:30), thus denying the standard Big Bang cosmology. This debate took place on Maat Oregon State University.

William lane craig stephen hawking